PFBoost

Vertical Farm Basics and Overview

Why Major Corporations Retreat from Vertical Farms: Pitfalls I Saw on the Ground

Vertical farms look like an attractive business for major corporations. With their capital, brand, and sales channels, they seem well-positioned to clear the high bar of equipment investment and the wall of distribution.

Even so, it is not unusual for them to withdraw soon after entering. The reason is not simply a lack of technology. Time to profitability, the difficulty of on-the-ground operations, and the high personnel costs and slow decision-making peculiar to large companies all compound one another.

In this article, I organize the advantages a major corporation brings when entering the vertical farm business, and the structural pitfalls that tend to drive them out.

Advantages and Reality When Major Corporations Enter Vertical Farming

When a major corporation enters the vertical farm business, it brings strengths that other companies do not have. Capital lets them acquire large sites, install the latest equipment, and pursue cost reduction through scale. The brand built up in its existing business translates directly into consumer trust and gives it an early advantage in sales. An existing distribution network also helps them sidestep the market-access problem that trips up so many new entrants.

Yet it is also a fact that many of them cannot put these strengths to work and are forced to withdraw. Structural problems specific to the vertical farm industry combine with problems that come from being a large company.


Why Do They Withdraw? The “Reality” and “Pitfalls” I Have Seen

From more than 10 years of watching operations firsthand, let me spell out the structural reasons behind “why they end up withdrawing.”

1. It Takes Time to Reach Profitability

The more advanced the technology you introduce, the larger the initial investment, and the longer the payback period. That timeline does not always fit the management style of a major corporation, which tends to demand short-term results.

Stabilizing the business takes years of sustained effort. Wholesale produce prices move in cycles, with high-price and low-price stretches. You need a long-term perspective and the resolve to keep going even when results are slow to show. Yet inside a major corporation, there is a structural risk that if results do not come, they have no choice but to withdraw early.

Beyond that, the idea that “high-quality vegetables grown with the latest technology will sell themselves” is an illusion. Quality alone does not win on price, and that holds just as true for a major corporation. Brand building and opening up distribution demand flexibility in responding to what consumers and buyers actually want.

The “Vertical Farm Is in the Red” Story: The Trick Most People Don’t Know

2. Operational Difficulty

At major corporations, where most employees have no farming background, the gaps in cultivation techniques, growing-environment control, and hygiene management are severe. Bringing in outside talent and developing people internally are indispensable, and the accumulation of know-how takes time. I have actually seen cases where workers on site, thrown into an unfamiliar environment and highly specialized tasks, struggled to stay motivated.

Even with the latest equipment, using it to create the optimal growing environment for the plants still takes specialized knowledge. Without data interpretation grounded in hands-on experience, and without the accumulation of know-how, effective production management is impossible.

What Insiders Never Say: The Real Vertical Farm Problem Is “People Don’t Stay”

3. The Pitfalls That Come from Being a “Major Corporation”

In a vertical farm, where cost reduction is required, the presence of highly paid employees on different-industry pay scales (such as secondees from the parent company) is a heavy burden. Because the overall personnel cost of the site rises, a structure emerges in which hiring becomes difficult even when the site is short-handed.

In major corporations, past successes and the organizational culture still run deep, and that gets in the way of adapting to a new business. In particular, when head office drives the project and opinions from the ground are treated as secondary, inefficient operations and falling worker motivation follow. Unless everyone involved, including the upper ranks, deeply understands the character of the vertical farm business, proper investment decisions and strategy are impossible.

On top of that, in a market environment where conditions change quickly, the complex decision-making processes peculiar to major corporations cause delay in response, and that leads to missed opportunities.


The Key to Success: What Does It Take to Succeed in the Vertical Farm Business?

The pitfall many companies fall into is demanding “short-term profit” too aggressively. Vertical farms have heavy initial investment, and they sell vegetables whose unit prices tend to be low. It is a business that takes time to break even to begin with. When results are demanded on a short horizon, the site gets pushed into unrealistic plans, which then trigger further failures — a vicious cycle. What is needed is the resolve to share a vision across the whole company and commit to it for the long haul.

Major corporations tend to have slow decision-making and an organizational structure where the voice of the ground does not easily reach the top. And yet vertical farms are a business that deals with living things. On the ground, conditions shift moment by moment, and what is asked of you is not theory alone but the experience and knowledge built up on the ground. In the facilities that were succeeding, people with deep hands-on experience were placed in leadership roles, and most of the decisions were entrusted to the site. Conversely, in organizations where leaders without hands-on experience make the decisions, in my experience most cases end in failure.

Major corporations are bound by their past successes, and tend to carry the methods of their existing business straight into vertical farming. When most of the staff are inexperienced, that is a dangerous move. Success requires the resolve to not be bound by the common sense of the existing business, and to build the organizational structure, the people, and the know-how from zero. Building an organization from scratch that fits this new business is the real key to success.

How Do You Become a “Vertical Farm That Earns”?

Without profit, a business does not stand. That is obvious.

To become a “vertical farm that earns,” you need to learn many things. In reality, the vertical farms that are producing results have their own know-how.

We provide know-how for improving profitability, aimed at vertical farm managers.

If you are thinking about improving your site, please take a look at the content below.

172 Tips for Raising the Profitability of a Vertical Farm


The Outlook for the Vertical Farm Business

Vertical farms are a business with great potential for solving the food problem and for realizing sustainable agriculture. The capital, the brand, and the distribution network of a major corporation should, in principle, be powerful weapons. To put them to work, the prerequisites are listening to the voice of the ground and running the business with a long-term perspective.

What the companies that withdraw have in common is this: they demanded a short-term payback, they pushed through head-office-led decisions, and they underestimated the challenges unique to agriculture. Put the other way around, the companies that enter with those three points factored in from the start have room to grow the operation, step by step.

172 Hints to Boost Your Vertical Farm Profitability

394 pages, 19 chapters, 172 topics. A practical knowledge collection built from 10+ years of hands-on experience in vertical farming. It brings together "hands-on knowledge from the floor" for vertical farms that you cannot get anywhere else.

Learn More

Free Tools